This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 美国话题 / TN3年征求意见稿出来了.
-steve888(Steve曾经曰过);
2008-5-9
(#4443146@0)
-
This is interesting... even though you apply for immigration before ( due to reason of with-draw or non-approval, you can still get an TN1 The dual intent doctrine holds that even though
a nonimmigrant visa applicant has previously
expressed a desire to enter the United States as an
immigrant—and may still have such a desire—that
does not of itself preclude the issuance of a
nonimmigrant visa to him nor preclude his being
a bona fide nonimmigrant. Matter of H-R-, 7 I&N
Dec. 651, 654 (INS Reg. Comm’r 1958). See also INA
section 214(h) (limiting dual intent to certain H, L,
and V nonimmigrants); 8 U.S.C. 1184(h).
-kwirky(kwirky);
2008-5-9
{493}
(#4443178@0)
-
TN不是dual intent。H-1B是。
-crashingwaves(波浪);
2008-5-9
(#4443263@0)
-
The interesting part is they allow some level of dual intent now.
-kwirky(kwirky);
2008-5-9
(#4443277@0)
-
The new TN does not allow dual intent. Dual intent allows limited immigration intent, only applies on H, L and V visa.
-cerboros_redux(Cerboros Reborn);
2008-5-9
(#4443323@0)
-
是的,对于中国出生的有GC排期问题的加拿大公民,三年还是不够申请GC的时间,但是对于没排期的加拿大公民,三年足够办移民了.
-oopp(ops);
2008-5-9
(#4443852@0)
-
可是只是在第三步开始后,你才不能有转换身份的意思,否则无法继续RENEW TN,之前几步时是可以的.难道那步居然3年下不来?
-tigerbinz(tigerbinz);
2008-5-9
(#4443861@0)
-
不知道你办的哪类,自己去查一下排期吧.
-oopp(ops);
2008-5-9
(#4443876@0)
-
哪里可以查?
-tigerbinz(tigerbinz);
2008-5-10
(#4443891@0)
-
....
-oopp(ops);
2008-5-10
(#4443948@0)
-
递交485是明显的移民倾向, TN是肯定不能延期了, 但是递交140后去border延期TN 还是有可能被拒签, depends on the POE officer.
-kwirky(kwirky);
2008-5-10
(#4444114@0)
-
据说是POE的人没有经验而犯的错误,我看到一篇文章说一定要邮寄申请,而不是去POE,说那样就不会拒。
-tigerbinz(tigerbinz);
2008-5-10
(#4444140@0)
-
你估计看反了。Grasmick说如果邮寄的话,填表的时候公司要disclose很多信息。如果到边界去签,就不需要说明。
-crashingwaves(CherryHill);
2008-5-10
(#4444410@0)
-
1 The dual intent doctrine holds that even thougha nonimmigrant visa applicant has previously
expressed a desire to enter the United States as an
immigrant—and may still have such a desire—that
does not of itself preclude the issuance of a
nonimmigrant visa to him nor preclude his being
a bona fide nonimmigrant. Matter of H-R-, 7 I&N
Dec. 651, 654 (INS Reg. Comm’r 1958). See also INA
section 214(h) (limiting dual intent to certain H, L,
and V nonimmigrants); 8 U.S.C. 1184(h).
-carletonwong(自己修车);
2008-5-11
{442}
(#4445372@0)
-
你理解错了。
-steve888(Steve曾经曰过);
2008-5-9
{1400}
(#4443512@0)
-
You are right.
-kwirky(kwirky);
2008-5-9
(#4443547@0)
-
我们是不是都该投票啊?
-windydays(风和日丽,不再windy);
2008-5-9
(#4443361@0)
-
不知道。可能应该叫雇主去发表意见,说TN对他们帮助很大吧。或者叫老美同事鼓动议员去支持。看吧,如果30天内没有公众反对意见,应该就不会有啥大问题了。
-steve888(Steve曾经曰过);
2008-5-9
(#4443517@0)
-
社会各界大家都可以发表意见.
-oopp(ops);
2008-5-9
(#4443847@0)
-
现在是听取大众反映的时间,大家都可以去发表意见,点Add Comments就可以直接进去,希望支持的人越多越好,我已经支持过了一票.
-oopp(ops);
2008-5-9
(#4443839@0)