This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 社会 / 免费《儿童保护法》讲座
-mach747(mach747);
2009-6-10
{1298}
(#5332312@0)
-
好消息。不过其中12岁以下儿童不能独处的问题,好像没有法律依据,希望核实一下。
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332336@0)
-
It is under Criminal Code that if kids under 10 are left home alone, parents can be charged with Failure to Provide Necessities, plus others. The Crown has legal duty to prove the case.
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332342@0)
-
能不能把法律的Link链接过来?我昨天去CAS没有找到,多谢
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332363@0)
-
It is under CFSA case law that kids under 12 cannot be left unsupervised. CAS has the legal duty to prove the case.
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332346@0)
-
我好像记得法律没有界定年龄,麻烦给一下法律原文link,多谢
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332366@0)
-
CASE LAW是案例,要找要花时间,CRIMINAL CODE拜尾找给你。
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332377@0)
-
因为我也问过警察和社工,都说没有具体要求,因为有的人可能12岁以上也还是什么都不知道,警察在执法中主要是看孩子是不是有独立能力。
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332383@0)
-
there is no age limit but you have to prove your children can take care themselves. But first the attornery must prove the children cannot take care themselves first.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-10
(#5332396@0)
-
所以我说她上面所说的10岁和12岁可能没有法律依据。
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332429@0)
-
Sorry, my mistake. Failure to provide necessities is up to 16 (s215). Abandonment or exposing a child to risk is up to 10 (s218). http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-46/bo-ga:l_VIII/20090609/en#anchorbo-ga:l_VIII
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332453@0)
-
就218款来说,还要证明孩子是处在危险之中才行,并没有说不能独处的问题,如果孩子有完全自理能力,也应该是可以的。我可不可以这样理解?
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332479@0)
-
That is subject to case law, i.e. decision by the judge. Parents have been convicted in the past under s 218.
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332494@0)
-
my understanding is that the charged is normally laid after an accident. of course if the baby is 1 yeas old and just learn how to walk, then you must not leave the baby alone.but let's say a boy who is 8 years old, and you teack him how to take care himself (you have to prove it), then it is ok to leave him at home, again not for extensive period. But everything is up to judgement, there is nothing solid that under certain age, you can't leave a kid at home.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-10
{290}
(#5332525@0)
-
对,我的理解是这样的,所以我看到CAS网页中关于10岁的界定比较诧异
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332558@0)
-
s218 does not have an age limit to specific require a baby sitter. but if there is accident happened, then the attornery can use s218 to sue the parents / guardian.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-10
(#5332498@0)
-
对,如果出现事故,按照这个审理。我就是想找到明确的法律依据
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332513@0)
-
if there is accident, then the parents / guardian must prove they have trained the kids how to take care themselves and the accident is beyond their control. But again, you better find a family lawyer to get some cases.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-10
(#5332532@0)
-
好的,多谢
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332547@0)
-
CFSA s37(1), person (child) under 16 unless under Part 4 of the order, i.e. 18.
CFSA s37(2)(a)(ii), .... failure to provide supervision....
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332487@0)
-
这个也应该是在出事以后按照此款审理,但是并不是说限定16岁以下不可以独处,是否正确?
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332540@0)
-
s37 2 b covers the likelihoodness.
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332561@0)
-
看这个:
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332549@0)
-
多谢,俺要好好研究一下
-cruiser99(Cruiser);
2009-6-10
(#5332564@0)
-
没事
-ontariocas(CAS);
2009-6-10
(#5332571@0)
-
幼童私離家 遭車撞傷凌晨時分
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-11
(#5333492@0)