This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 社会 / 至于她后来的到英国逃避、自杀,都不能代表,在CAS带走她儿子的那一刻,她的病情当时就那么严重。后来的严重,只能说明是 那个CAS 不负责任的行为 造成 的后果。 -goldensands(Dream); 6.14 05:14 (#5341275@0) 能争取的是三种结果:1 CAS Internal Review,出了人命,一句No Comments撇清跟自己所有的关系,只会Outrage更多的纳税人;
2 Public Inquiry,这个必须要有直系家属的直接推动才能做到。案子一旦go public,家属要有承受被CAS大抖隐私的不堪。虽说比起为孩他妈申冤,别的都不足挂齿。但突然经历如此巨变,财务、精力、心理是否能够承受,都是疑问,犹豫不决是很自然的事情。
3 民事诉讼,除了家属要有豁出去的决心,还需要有律师的帮忙。
-oldyou();
2009-6-15
{396}
(#5345196@0)
-
item 3 - Victim's family may have to pay big $$$$$ to find a lawyer. But if CAS was proven responsible during public inquiry, then it would be easier to do a 民事诉讼 against CAS.But it is their decsion.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-15
{24}
(#5345204@0)
-
看起来还没处讲理啦
-goldensands(Dream);
2009-6-16
(#5345840@0)
-
I already said it many time. Ask your MPP and Minsiter of Children to launch a public inquiry and ask local media, e.g. newspaper and TV to report this incident to draw more public attention.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-16
(#5345855@0)
-
你们不会是想那个爸爸也去跳楼吧
如果你是这个家庭大男人,现在医生,CAS 都告
诉你的老婆精神有问题,需要治疗,你会不会让你的老婆明天单独带儿子去英国
-may11(May);
2009-6-16
(#5345862@0)
-
Of course, I don't want the husband to kill himself. I won't let my wife leave my side if she has mental illness. So you said the wife decided to go even the husband didn't agree.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-16
(#5345872@0)
-
老婆有精神病,孩子都给保护了,我一定会想尽办法不老婆离开我
一步,他的老婆却去了英国,还带孩子,可想而知就是那个老公非常无
奈,根本没有办法阻止,另外如果没有办法阻止老婆去英国,也应该跟着一起去,
可是他什么也没有做到,就证明他根本就是放弃了
-may11(May);
2009-6-16
(#5345884@0)
-
I know you would not like my answers. But as I often said how much we know. This poor man has a job to do and he may never know his wife want to go to England.By the time he went home after work. His wife may already arrived England. He has a little baby to take care and he has to work to earn income. He just started a new job and he may not be able to take any leave. Again, I don't know the detials so I am not in a position to defend the husband.
But if you know anyone who has mental illness, you would know the spouse would also suffer very large pressure.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-16
{412}
(#5345898@0)
-
I don't know who this guy is. He's being trying to intimidate the child's father and discouraging everyone from questioning CAS ever since the beginning. I hope he's from CAS or its affiliate, otherwise I see another mentally troubled person.
-oldyou();
2009-6-16
(#5345910@0)
-
are you talking about me?
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-16
(#5345912@0)
-
no, the person you were talking to. He obviously knows quite a lot of information about this case, probably more information than anybody else in thei forum
-oldyou();
2009-6-16
(#5345914@0)
-
He more likely is just an id Sailor hired to keep the burners hot.
-win(秋天的菠菜);
2009-6-16
(#5345918@0)
-
Did her husband agree that she took their elder son to England? And who informed the CAS in England? Did she receive any medical treatment in England?
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-16
(#5345891@0)
-
她带大儿子不看医生,跑去英国是一个致命错误,他老公不跟一起去也是一个大错误,
证明他老公对於太太精神病认识不够吧,CAS 倒是非常负责,去了英国还要保护她
们,想想也真是危险,大儿子本来就是残废,她有病怎么照顾儿子
-may11(May);
2009-6-16
(#5345904@0)
-
Do you know who notify CAS in Englnad? Her husband? or Ontario CAS?
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-16
(#5345960@0)
-
这个还不简单啊,一定是CAS要找那个母亲,爸爸说带着另外一个儿子去了英国,那
个黑大妈可能吓都要吓死,马上连续英国CAS
-may11(May);
2009-6-16
(#5346145@0)
-
here
-zhayan(with an Orchid);
2009-6-16
{1091}
(#5346766@0)
-
总说孩子在妈妈身边危险危险的,我真不明白拉,有什么记录或者证人证明孩子受到过伤害吗?为什么就一再坚持孩子会有可能受到伤害呢。一个致死都未发生的假设阿
-goldensands(Dream);
2009-6-17
(#5348927@0)
-
你说到点子上了。这正是事情的关键。但CAS的人不会正面回答这个问题的。他们会说如何如何依据法律。他们固执的认为是那样,虽然没有任何依据凭证。而事实上这只是个假设,基于这个假设,他们利用法律,夺去了孩子,夺去了母亲的权利,夺去了母亲的希望!而这些都是事实!
-newmajia2(新马甲2);
2009-6-17
{114}
(#5351695@0)
-
What if the mom get a hold of the drug she asked for?
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
2009-6-17
(#5351798@0)