This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 社会 / 再看自杀母亲在网上的留言,事情的过程越来越清楚了
-may11(May);
2009-6-20
{1502}
(#5358435@0)
-
1。她根本就没有害怕CAS 2。父亲确实没有照顾好他的家人 3。她承认要去外国看病,其实她是知道自己有病。结论就是没有任何人导致悲剧的发生,原因是自己的选择
-may11(May);
2009-6-20
(#5358446@0)
-
57%的少年犯与CAS有关,36%被的CAS保护的孩子进少管所。只有24%高中毕业。安省1%孩子被CAS所害 http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/03/07/childrens-aid-070307.html http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/publications_forms/bulletin/2008/08-07-04_public-forum.html
-patrickholder(blm);
2009-6-20
{267}
(#5358450@0)
-
Since you know CAS so well, do you mind to tell us among all these children who went to jail, how many of them were in the custody of CAS and how many did live with their original families.My understanding is most of children who had a report opened with CAS, still live with their family or their parents' relative or friends. So how can CAS be responsible for those children?
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
{190}
(#5358510@0)
-
这个可能要看具体的人和事。人的成长是最没有办法做实验的,因为没有谁的生命可以重来一次。不知道没有CAS介入孩子又会怎样。整体看,有CAS介入的孩子本来就没有一个健康的家庭环境,肯定有一定比例的孩子在CAS接手的时候就已经是问题儿童了。就好像看看城市里重点中学考大学升学率有多高,农村普通中学升学率有多高。
我相信也支持CAS需要改进,但单纯否定CAS不是解决问题的办法。
-hhorse(hhorse);
2009-6-20
{130}
(#5358552@0)
-
"整体看,有CAS介入的孩子本来就没有一个健康的家庭环境,肯定有一定比例的孩子在CAS接手的时候就已经是问题儿童了". 这才是正确的辩论方式。那些拼命诋毁CAS的人,真应该学一学如何写scientific publications。
-ellesmeer(明天可能是晴天);
2009-6-21
(#5360652@0)
-
就像我和心理医生所说,孩子有我带着,没人治疗他 Did her psycharist really say that?
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
(#5358490@0)
-
She told the psychatrist..
-hhbt(What the heck);
2009-6-20
(#5358531@0)
-
sorry, my poor Chinese!
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
(#5358536@0)
-
但是昨天那篇CAS每年死80个孩子的贴子导致了我精神崩毁, her own words. CAS's lawyer would love to read it out loud in the court.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
(#5358513@0)
-
想想我在这些医生面前的表现也是非常的情绪化 - that would be the reason that her doctor called CAS. He did the right thing.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
(#5358515@0)
-
我在国外带着老大也可以看医生,父亲应该子到自己错了会积极的把孩子拿回来照顾,希望是这样,不过我自己真实死而复活一次。这个证明了为什么CAS不找父亲原因吧
-may11(May);
2009-6-20
(#5358825@0)
-
Must be my Chinese, don't quite understadn what she wanted to say.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
(#5358977@0)
-
可以转个话题了, 看了都审美疲劳了.
-zhayan(with an Orchid);
2009-6-20
(#5358535@0)
-
一个精神不稳定的人的话不能做为证词,今天这样,明天就反过来。以词为cas开脱,不成立~~
-shouruo(shouruo);
2009-6-20
(#5358635@0)
-
then the next question from the lawyer may be if 精神不稳定的人 would put her baby in risk.
-hkchan(*);
2009-6-20
(#5358637@0)