This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 社会 / Look how Chicago Mayor deals with union members. Is there a hope that Toronto will have a mayor like this?
-guaibaolili(xiaolili);
2009-8-1
(#5459028@0)
-
明年投票时大家一定要组织一下,争取把david miller搞下去
-ywgan(Do something);
2009-8-1
(#5459033@0)
-
所有投"Yes“票的家伙们也要让他们滚蛋!“养兵千日,用兵一时”,关键时候当缩头王八,冒充和事佬和稀泥,不站在我们市民一边,要他们何用?咱们这儿那个鲤鱼哥们儿辛苦一天举个牌子去转悠为啥?不就是盼他们能代表大家的利益抗争到底。要不大家这一个多月的人质罪有都白受了!来年再接着给咱们加税。什么阿猫阿狗的政府工工会都骑在咱们的脖子上任意大小便,大家这冤大头当得还没完没了啦?
-lancelot(圆桌骑士);
2009-8-1
{144}
(#5459078@0)
-
No chance; toronto will have strike again, again ...
-hipacific(crystalblue);
2009-8-1
(#5459084@0)
-
DON'T VOTE = VOTE FOR MILLER! Last time, there were about 600,000 people went to vote and David Miller had 332,969 vote. There were about 2,000,0000 people who are eligible to vote.Only 30% showed up. If the silent majority still prefer to keep their mouth shut and don't show up in the coming election. The consequence is same as voting for David Miller.
So it would be up to you and I who have voting right in the coming Toronto election to decide the future of Toronto and how much tax you are going to pay!
-hkchan(0);
2009-8-4
{335}
(#5462010@0)
-
如果一罢工市长就被选下去,那以后市长就更怕工会了,恐怕工会要什么就赶紧答应,只要不罢工就好.
-bully2007(2007);
2009-8-1
(#5459089@0)
-
罢工不是市长的错, 问题是david miller本身就是大工会的代言人, 工会是他的大票仓, 只有换一个强硬的市长上台才能避免以后越来越多的对工会妥协. 这次罢工和签协议看上去就是david miller和工会联手导演的闹剧, 唯一的受害者就是市民.
-ywgan(Do something);
2009-8-1
(#5459145@0)
-
如果市长是工会的代言人, 那他为什么不早点答应工会的所有要求,避免损人不利己的罢工呢?.
-bully2007(2007);
2009-8-1
(#5459173@0)
-
黑脸,白脸演戏都不懂。你如果看了市议会的辩论,你就会发现市长完全是工会的代表,说的话简直就是像工会主席。没有一句话为市民,纳税人着想。而且对议员的态度极其恶劣,因为议长也是市长的人,结果反对者连话都说不上,问题都不允许问。整个一黑社会。
-steve888(Steve曾经曰过);
2009-8-1
(#5459177@0)
-
实在没有看出来演黑脸,白脸戏的必要.象其它905城市一样偷偷摸摸给个9%工资涨幅,如果没有罢工, 90%的市民根本就不会注意这事. MILLER的问题就是开始装强硬,说是能省100,最后只兑现了50.
-bully2007(2007);
2009-8-1
(#5459182@0)
-
为下次加地税作舆论准备。不清楚905的情况,但是多伦多市中间偏左,市长希望继续左下去,需要舆论支持,否则很可能右转。
-steve888(Steve曾经曰过);
2009-8-1
(#5459249@0)
-
Raymond Cho的发言才是搞笑:除了感谢各位并且向市长表忠心外,还特地感谢一下Home Depot。议会在谈与工会的合同的事情,和Home Depot有啥关系?
-lionel(Lionel);
2009-8-1
(#5459185@0)
-
对。最恶心就是他了。简直是华人的耻辱。给他email,连个象征性的回复都没有。其他人即使准备Yes,至少回复解释一下下。
-steve888(Steve曾经曰过);
2009-8-1
(#5459248@0)
-
Please don't vote for any NDP next time。对 NDP representative - David Miller very very 失望,记得上次预算案Concillors投票押后通过时,TTC的主席和David Miller一起唱双簧的嘴脸。。。。
-felix0000(人造太阳);
2009-8-2
(#5459896@0)
-
Raymond Cho 不是华人是棒子就是韩国人,你写中文给他,他不明白当然不会给你回信
-may11(吃饱了撑的);
2009-8-2
(#5460105@0)
-
Raymond Cho 不是华人的耻辱,因为不是华人,是不是棒子的耻辱要问问棒子们
-may11(吃饱了撑的);
2009-8-2
(#5460110@0)
-
不要以为LAY-OFF掉CUPE的工人,MILLER就会这肥差contract给苦难的穷人去干。NO!还不是他们的三亲六顾,胡朋狗友得到这肥差!然后再让苦难的穷人10CAD/HR去干,DID YOU NOTICE IN YOUR WEB LINK, PEOPLE MENTIONED THAT THE CHICAGO MAYOR'S COUSINS OWN BIG GARBAGE COLLECTION / RECYLING BUSINESS, THAT IS BEING SAID THEY GONNA GET THE BIG AT CONTRACT FROM THE CITY.
-dvd(weiwei);
2009-8-2
{200}
(#5460083@0)
-
Thank you for pointing this out, but I'm wondering why the laid off works are preparing suing union leaders for costing their jobs . Why don't they sue the mayor ? 那边黑吃黑, 这边呢? 至少这个市长敢于削减工会会员福利或收入.哪个多伦多市长敢?
-guaibaolili(xiaolili);
2009-8-3
(#5461031@0)
-
This is still better than legally robbing from union. There would be more chance to catch them if they have secrete deals.
-hhorse(hhorse);
2009-8-3
(#5461373@0)
-
You are right and we must setup a good disclouse mechanism about the relationship between bidding companies and city officals. However, if a company can meet all the requirements and put in the lowest bid;should we care if the owner is the spouse of Mayor?
-hkchan(0);
2009-8-4
{51}
(#5461982@0)